An Editorial Criticized A Chart Caption

What is wrong with this statement.

An editorial criticized a chart caption. The easiest way to check your caption is to make sure it has the following qualifiers. Who what where and when. 47 94 an editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces thethe chance of plaque on teeth by over 400 percent what is wrong with this statement.

A reduction of 100 would eliminate all plaque so it is not possible to reduce it by more than 100. Chose the correct answe below. The problem with this statement is that the percentage exceeds 100.

Simply examine your image and describe what s going on. For newsworthy content to have any long term value it must include a proper editorial caption that identifies the important aspects of the image footage clip. A reduction of 100 would eliminate all plaque so it is not possible to reduce it by more than 100.

You can put this solution on your website. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reducesan editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces thethe chance ofchance of plaqueplaque onon teethteeth by overby over nbsp 400 percent 400 percent. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental floss as one that reduces thethe chance ofchance of plaqueplaque onon teethteeth by overby over nbsp 350 percent 350 percent what is wrong with this statement.

A new york times editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces plaque on teeth by over 300. The most you can reduce a certain amount is by 100. A new york times editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces plaque on teeth by over 300 what is wrong with that statement.

The statement should ve stated that the dental rinse could reduce plaque up to 100 instead.